Thursday, January 24, Let's All Argue About Rhetorical Analysis As humans, we sometimes deem it necessary to argue in order to get our points across and help our rivals come to a better understanding of life, or at least life as we view it. But more often than not, the argument ends with each side shouting obscenities about the other's mother. And although the article itself is about the uselessness of arguing, Tannen writes her article in an almost satirical way of arguing with the reader, trying to prove that she is correct in her ideals.
Tannen hits the nail on the head, and keeps hitting and hitting and hitting. Jun 25, Gilahk rated it it was amazing This book, written almost 20 years ago could have been written today only with so many more examples of how polarized the discourse in America has become.
In one of the chapters she writes about email becoming more and more prevalent as a means of communication, citing the benefits and yet the loss of one to one communication that too much reliance on email might foster.
She got that right as well as alerting to the alarming trend of more coarse and brutish dialogue that ensues when posting on s This book, written almost 20 years ago could have been written today only with so many more examples of how polarized the discourse in America has become.
She got that right as well as alerting to the alarming trend of more coarse and brutish dialogue that ensues when posting on social media is anonymous. Today we emphasize trying to learn from differences and respecting that there is some truth in all sides, and that most issues cannot be boiled to to black and white, for or against etc.
Or there is little talk about issues. The broadcast news either talks about the intimate details of celebrities lives or a mass shooting somewhere.
Analysis of current events in the nation and in the world and how they affect us is left to very bright comedians who have late night talk shows, certainly not journalists or people who have seriously studied stuff like Professor Tannen.
Today every solution is challenged by a group that sees it as a threat to their way of life or to some privilege they have gotten used to.
Where is the common good? Of being a bit discomforted so that all prosper? This is an excellent book and a very depressing read.Apr 19, · The final reason Deborah Tannen was very successful establishing her arguments with her essay is because she explains very well the differences with men and with women from her own studies and research.
Heteronormativity Affects Us All Whilst this essay's principle argument is that heteronormativity affects LGBT people in the UK, and is an enduringly relevant concept, one of my main discoveries from this research is the extent to which heteronormativity affects us all, and an understanding of it must not be limited to its affect on LGBT people.
The kernel of Tannen's argument, as in her earlier books on communications between couples, at the workplace, and among family members, is that every conversation is conducted on two levels: the. Mar 10, · In Deborah Tannen’s article, “But What Do You Mean?” she discusses seven areas of difficulty in communication between men and women.
Tannen classifies these problematic areas of conversations as: apologies, criticism, thank-yous, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. Genderlect is the term used by Em Griffin () to label Deborah Tannen’s theory of “cross-cultural communication” which describes communication between men and women.
Griffin continues to explain, “The term genderlect suggests that masculine and feminine styles of discourse are best viewed as two distinct cultural dialects rather than as inferior or superior ways of speaking” (p.
The argument of "Sex, Lies, and Conversation" is one that Tannen has written about at length in her academic work and in her bestselling book, You Just .